A new study reveals ambiguities in disease classification (ICD) coding practices that complicate regional comparisons of respiratory infections.
RT’s Three Key Takeaways:
- Coding Variability Across Regions: The study revealed significant regional differences in how ICD codes for acute respiratory infections are applied, highlighting inconsistencies that cannot be explained by variations in health care utilization.
- Ambiguities in Classification: Certain ICD codes, such as J06 (acute upper respiratory infections of multiple and unspecified sites), were used almost interchangeably with others like J00 (common cold) and J20 (bronchitis), suggesting widespread classification ambiguity.
- Implications for Public Health: Researchers say these inconsistencies could hinder efforts to generate comparable health data across regions, complicating government health planning and preparedness for future pandemics.
Findings from a new study published in Annals of Family Medicine reveal inconsistencies in how International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are applied, which could complicate efforts to track respiratory infections and compare health data across regions.Â
These issues may have significant implications for managing future pandemics beyond COVID-19.
The study analyzed weekly national diagnosis data for acute respiratory infections in Poland. Covering all 380 county-equivalent administrative regions and encompassing 292 million consultations, the findings highlight ambiguities in coding practices.
Significant differences in diagnoses were observed across regions, even after separating data into age groups. This variability cannot be explained by different health care utilization, given the shifting proportions of diagnoses with similar severity.
Additionally, there were numerous pairs of strongly negatively correlated codes implying classification ambiguity. For example, the ICD code J06 (acute upper respiratory infections of multiple and unspecified sites), was used almost interchangeably with a diverse range of others, especially J00 (common cold) and J20 (bronchitis).
The findings suggest that ICD codes, while designed to standardize global health data, have ambiguities that limit their effectiveness. Researchers say these issues can hinder their ability to generate comparable data across regions and complicate their use in government health planning. Such variability in diagnostic coding poses challenges for public health, especially when consistent and accurate data are critical for preparing and responding to pandemics.
ID 317304329 © Justlight | Dreamstime.com